O
Temecula
← Community
UtilitiesCommunity discussion

SDG&E Golden Pacific Power Link Transmission Project

Temecula

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (65)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
67
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 26, 2026.

Public comments (67)

OpposedShalini RenfroMay 26, 2026

Co-founder of 'Save Temecula, Fight the Power Link,' noting over 6,000 petition signatures against the proposed SDG&E route and urging immediate council opposition.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:46:27 →
OpposedRachel AllenMay 26, 2026

Local realtor warning that 200-foot transmission towers will devastate property values and exacerbate insurance crises.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:48:13 →
OpposedParadise BaronaMay 26, 2026

Expressed deep concern over wildfire risks associated with utility infrastructure and the impact on tourism.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:49:35 →
OpposedPatricia GranchaMay 26, 2026

Warned about electromagnetic fields, noise, and wildfire risks, criticizing utility statements.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:51:35 →
OpposedCharles CoeMay 26, 2026

Longtime resident ready to fight the project just as the community fought Liberty Quarry.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:51:58 →
NeutralJohn HicksMay 26, 2026

Offered expertise in energy trading and power procurement to assist the city in analyzing utility data.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 4:48:17 →
OpposedDennis LongMay 26, 2026

Father and eagle scout leader urging the city to reject the power line project.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:54:57 →
OpposedJared SlusserMay 26, 2026

Energy sector professional stating that local solar and battery installations will double the power needed by 2032, making the lines unnecessary.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:55:36 →
OpposedLarry SlusserMay 26, 2026

Praised council for standing up for residents and suggested exploring undergrounding or alternatives.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:56:47 →
OpposedMelanie NeimanMay 26, 2026

Resident near Temecula Creek receiving late notice from SDG&E regarding property access for surveys.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:58:05 →
OpposedAdam RuizMay 26, 2026

Speaking for Temecula Advocacy Coalition, representing tourism and winegrowers, opposing the route through wine country.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 2:59:14 →
OpposedChristopher BaileyMay 26, 2026

Speaking for Visit Temecula Valley in opposition to transmission towers threatening scenic corridors and tourism.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:00:14 →
OpposedEric SchwartzMay 26, 2026

Morgan Hill resident highlighting fire risks and interference with aerial firefighting along Temecula Creek.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:02:41 →
OpposedLori HolseyMay 26, 2026

Stated that meeting attendance does not capture the full scope of community opposition due to work schedules.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:03:31 →
OpposedRobert QuaidMay 26, 2026

Criticized state regulators and utility routing decisions.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:03:37 →
OpposedKathy SizemoreMay 26, 2026

Former Quality of Life Master Plan committee member stating the project violates core city values.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:06:09 →
OpposedJim NeiderreckerMay 26, 2026

Cited studies on elevated childhood cancer rates near high-voltage transmission lines.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:08:46 →
OpposedDax SnyderMay 26, 2026

Red Hawk Community Association president voicing strong opposition and property value concerns.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:08:53 →
OpposedEdward HublerMay 26, 2026

Corporate executive noting that the Temecula route was chosen primarily to cut costs for utility shareholders.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:11:46 →
OpposedKrista ChaichMay 26, 2026

Temecula Valley Wine Growers Association Executive Director opposing the route through wine country and agricultural preserves.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 5:20:01 →
OpposedGabrielle RenfroMay 26, 2026

Urged the city to fight the project and encouraged residents to join grassroots opposition groups.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:13:14 →
OpposedRoss JacksonMay 26, 2026

Temecula Old Town Association board secretary urging opposition to preserve the city's long-term character.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:14:55 →
OpposedMichelle CormacMay 26, 2026

Resident living along Temecula Creek expressing distrust of utility statements and fire insurance concerns.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:16:43 →
OpposedMonty SharpMay 26, 2026

Raised concerns about electromagnetic field exposure risks to children near schools in Vale Ranch.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:18:02 →
OpposedBob CormacMay 26, 2026

Cited historical data on catastrophic California wildfires caused by power lines in creek drainages.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:19:20 →
OpposedRose CoronaMay 26, 2026

50-year resident and local business owner thanking the council for thorough research and opposing the project.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:20:10 →
OpposedTim ParksMay 26, 2026

Longtime resident urging the city to pursue legal and ordinance options to block the power lines.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:21:43 →
OpposedMarsha CasoMay 26, 2026

Expressed deep distrust of utility representatives and called for community unity.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:21:59 →
OpposedLinda McDonaldMay 26, 2026

40-year resident recalling past victories against Valley Rainbow and Liberty Quarry, urging a local ordinance.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:23:45 →
OpposedAvelyn TravisMay 26, 2026

Offered professional utility project experience to help block the power line route.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:23:49 →
OpposedDr. Yuan HawksMay 26, 2026

19-year resident stating Temecula is a home, not a map dot, urging protection of the community.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 7:01:41 →
OpposedJim SchlossMay 26, 2026

Engineer praising council questions and encouraging holding utility feet to the fire on engineering studies.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:26:25 →
OpposedMichael FarewellMay 26, 2026

Red Hawk resident noting that state legislation limits litigation, requiring early and united opposition.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:26:16 →
OpposedGillian LarsonMay 26, 2026

Praised staff and council, criticizing utility representatives for poor preparation and lack of answers.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:27:39 →
OpposedDr. Joseph KomroskiMay 26, 2026

TVUSD school board member and resident speaking on behalf of Vail Ranch Middle School students and community opposition.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 8:03:20 →
OpposedJohn MitchellMay 26, 2026

Resident living along the creek urging legal injunctions and lawsuits against the utility.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:30:43 →
OpposedCindy AllenMay 26, 2026

Expressed health concerns over cancer risks and property degradation from power lines.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:30:57 →
OpposedDavid AllenMay 26, 2026

Stated he uses solar and battery backup, rejecting the utility project.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:32:32 →
OpposedLisa SleemanMay 26, 2026

Temecula Creek homeowner discussing financial impacts, property values, and tax assessments.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:32:42 →
OpposedMark WinklerMay 26, 2026

Save Temecula nonprofit representative highlighting safety, health, and economic harms.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:32:42 →
OpposedDennis FitzMay 26, 2026

Retired UCR environmental researcher noting that distributed power is the future and utility plans are obsolete.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:35:41 →
OpposedChristina BracamonteMay 26, 2026

Local mother expressing mama bear opposition to the project.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:37:08 →
OpposedDon SmittyMay 26, 2026

Questioned the lack of risk management plans and stakeholder analysis regarding future generations.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:38:50 →
OpposedSandy B.May 26, 2026

Expressed frustration over EMF safety thresholds and corporate financial priorities.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:38:52 →
OpposedJames NovelloMay 26, 2026

Former San Onofre worker citing radiation and health concerns related to power lines.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:41:08 →
OpposedJeanette NositaMay 26, 2026

Summit View resident noting the visual impact and highlighting Temecula's national prominence in tourism.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:41:44 →
OpposedNancy SnowdenMay 26, 2026

Aubrey Place board member representing 180 units bordering Temecula Creek opposing the project.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:43:22 →
OpposedTaylor LawMay 26, 2026

Barringer Creek resident detailing a recent creek fire and how open airspace allowed CAL FIRE aerial suppression.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:44:16 →
OpposedJody ChristopherMay 26, 2026

Raised concerns over non-ionizing radiation and out-of-state power generation.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:46:49 →
OpposedBob CowMay 26, 2026

Questioned projected energy demand growth and reliance on imported solar panels.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:47:50 →
OpposedWilliam VoigtMay 26, 2026

Nighthawk Pass resident who invested life savings in a home 500 feet from the proposed lines.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 13:20:00 →
OpposedTara ThomasMay 26, 2026

Children's pastor noting the presence of preschools and churches along the route.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:49:42 →
OpposedMichael FeinbergMay 26, 2026

36-year resident and power line fire lawyer discussing utility wildfire liability and legal history.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:51:21 →
OpposedLorraine WhiteMay 26, 2026

Morgan Hill resident criticizing utility representatives for being unprepared and disrespectful.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:53:37 →
OpposedSarah GeigerMay 26, 2026

17-year resident stating the project must be killed entirely if it cannot bypass Temecula.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:54:03 →
OpposedTeresa BreakerMay 26, 2026

Resident living directly on Temecula Creek noting that property values and views are already impacted by being on the map.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:55:55 →
OpposedPeggy BartelsMay 26, 2026

Cited statistics showing California has the highest transmission line wildfire fatality rate in the nation.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:57:01 →
OpposedMiguel GonzalezMay 26, 2026

Noted existing infrastructure corridors and urged more thorough utility homework before targeting Temecula.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:58:12 →
OpposedChristopher MullerMay 26, 2026

Argued the project stems from utility suppression of rooftop solar through trade association lobbying.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:59:27 →
OpposedHong MinMay 26, 2026

Temecula Valley Hospital CEO opposing the power lines due to local grid reliability and emergency care priorities.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 3:59:46 →
OpposedAbraham FeltisMay 26, 2026

Longtime resident and business owner stating the community must protect its heart and reject utility lines.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 4:00:45 →
SupportiveStephanie BaxterMay 26, 2026

Fallbrook Community Planning Group member expressing solidarity against forced regional infrastructure dumping.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 4:01:54 →
OpposedVeronica LangworthyMay 26, 2026

Wildomar resident sharing historical anecdotes about flash floods and poor routing choices.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 4:03:30 →
OpposedMarcus HerediaMay 26, 2026

SDSU habitat restoration worker and local tribal citizen detailing cultural and ecological significance of the river corridor.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 4:04:33 →
OpposedRon J. WilsonMay 26, 2026

Resident noting the proposed corridor would run directly through his living room edge.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 4:05:57 →
OpposedSamantha HunterMay 26, 2026

US of A Miss Temecula expressing fear over generational impacts and the meaning of Temecula's name.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 4:06:50 →
OpposedDr. Aaron Dornen LiutsoMay 26, 2026

Resident near Temecula Parkway criticizing the 3-year delay in public notification and wildfire bottlenecks.

City Council — May 26, 2026 · 18:58:21 →